Exide Industries Bundle

Who Owns Exide Industries?
Understanding the ownership structure of a company is crucial as it reveals who holds the power and influences its strategic decisions. For a company like Exide Industries, a major player in India's battery market, its ownership history and current stakeholders are key to grasping its market position and future direction.

The journey of Exide Industries, from its inception to its current standing, is intrinsically linked to its ownership evolution. Tracing back to its founding as a joint venture, the company's transition to an Indian-owned entity marked a significant turning point, shaping its operational philosophy and market engagement.
Exide Industries, incorporated on January 31, 1947, as Associated Battery Makers (Eastern) Limited, has a rich history that includes a period as a joint venture with the American Exide Corporation. This collaboration laid the groundwork for its expertise in energy storage solutions. By the early 2000s, the company had fully transitioned to Indian ownership, a move that solidified its identity as a domestic leader. Today, Exide Industries commands a substantial market share, estimated at around 40% in the Indian automotive battery sector as of 2023. Its operations span across 11 factories in India, with international subsidiaries in the UK, Singapore, and Sri Lanka, demonstrating a broad operational reach. The company's strategic investments in emerging technologies, such as lithium-ion batteries, highlight its forward-looking approach. To understand its strategic positioning further, one might explore the Exide Industries BCG Matrix. The question of who controls Exide Industries and its major shareholders is central to understanding its corporate governance and future growth strategies.
The ownership of Exide Industries is a complex interplay of various stakeholders, including its promoters, institutional investors, and the public. The promoters, who are instrumental in the company's establishment and early growth, typically hold a significant stake. Institutional investors, such as mutual funds and foreign portfolio investors, also play a vital role, often influencing corporate decisions through their substantial holdings. The public shareholders, who own shares traded on stock exchanges, contribute to the company's liquidity and market valuation. Examining the Exide Industries shareholders list provides a clear picture of who the largest shareholder in Exide Industries is and the distribution of ownership. This detailed understanding is essential for anyone looking into Exide Industries investor relations or its overall corporate structure.
The Exide Industries board of directors, comprising both executive and non-executive members, is responsible for overseeing the company's management and ensuring accountability to all shareholders. The non-executive directors, in particular, bring an independent perspective to board deliberations, contributing to robust corporate governance. The key management team, led by the CEO, is tasked with executing the company's strategic vision and driving its financial performance. The history of Exide Industries ownership reveals a steady growth trajectory, underpinned by strategic decisions made by its leadership and influenced by its shareholder base. Understanding the responsibilities of Exide Industries board members is key to appreciating the governance framework that guides the company's operations and its commitment to stakeholders.
Who Founded Exide Industries?
Exide Industries Limited, originally incorporated as 'Associated Battery Makers (Eastern) Limited' on January 31, 1947, has a foundational history deeply intertwined with its predecessor, CESCO. CESCO, established in India in 1920, was a manufacturing division of the UK-based Chloride Electric Storage Co. Ltd., a company that itself traces its lineage back to the US-based Exide Technologies. While specific details regarding the initial equity distribution among its earliest individual founders are not extensively documented in publicly accessible records from that era, the company's inception involved the acquisition of CESCO's existing manufacturing operations.
The establishment of the first manufacturing plant in Shamnagar, West Bengal, marked the formal commencement of operations for Associated Battery Makers Eastern Limited (ABMEL) within the Indian industrial landscape. The early ownership structure was significantly influenced by the Chloride Group Plc, a global leader in lead-acid battery technology at the time. This foreign collaboration played a crucial role, reflecting confidence in the technical expertise of Indian scientists. This historical connection highlights the substantial role of its foreign collaborator, which eventually divested its trademark and operations in India to the company's management in 1991, paving the way for full Indian ownership in the early 2000s. The core vision driving the company's founding was to cultivate a robust domestic battery manufacturing capability to serve India's expanding automotive sector and other vital industrial applications.
Exide Industries Limited was incorporated on January 31, 1947.
The company began its journey under the name 'Associated Battery Makers (Eastern) Limited'.
Its genesis involved taking over the manufacturing business of CESCO, India, established in 1920.
Early ownership was significantly linked to the Chloride Group Plc, a UK-based entity.
The foreign collaborator divested its trademark and operations in India in 1991, leading to full Indian ownership in the early 2000s.
The founding vision was to establish a strong indigenous battery manufacturing base in India.
The early ownership structure of Exide Industries was characterized by its strong ties to the Chloride Group Plc, a global leader in lead-acid battery technology. This foreign collaboration was instrumental in the company's establishment, reflecting a belief in the technical capabilities of Indian professionals. The company's journey is detailed further in the Brief History of Exide Industries.
- The company was incorporated on January 31, 1947, as 'Associated Battery Makers (Eastern) Limited'.
- It took over the manufacturing business of CESCO, India, which was established in 1920.
- CESCO was a division of the UK-based Chloride Electric Storage Co. Ltd.
- The initial plant was set up in Shamnagar, West Bengal.
- The Chloride Group Plc divested its Indian operations in 1991.
- Full Indian ownership was achieved in the early 2000s.
Exide Industries SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format

How Has Exide Industries’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Exide Industries Limited transitioned into a publicly traded entity with its Initial Public Offering (IPO) on June 30, 2002. This move marked a significant step in its journey, opening its doors to a broader investor base. The company's market capitalization stood at ₹332.58 Billion as of July 2025, reflecting its substantial presence in the market.
The ownership structure of Exide Industries has evolved, notably with the divestment by Chloride Group plc in 1991, which paved the way for full Indian ownership in the early 2000s. This shift granted the company greater autonomy in charting its strategic course.
Stakeholder Group | Percentage of Ownership (as of June 2025) | Change from Previous Quarter (March 2025) |
Promoter Group (Chloride Eastern Limited) | 45.99% | Stable |
Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs/FPIs) | 11.47% | Decreased from 11.60% |
Mutual Funds | 10.30% | Decreased from 11.11% |
Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) | 0.32% | Data for July 2025 |
Individual Retail Investors | 25.26% | Data for July 2025 |
The consistent promoter holding, primarily by Chloride Eastern Limited, at 45.99% as of the June 2025 quarter, underscores a stable core ownership that significantly influences the company's strategic direction. Institutional investors, both foreign and domestic, play a vital role in Exide's shareholder landscape. While FIIs/FPIs held 11.47% and Mutual Funds 10.30% in June 2025, the collective holdings of individual retail investors reached 25.26% by July 2025. Key institutional shareholders include prominent entities like Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund, Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund, and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF. This blend of stable promoter backing and diverse institutional and retail investor interest supports the company's long-term initiatives, such as its investment in lithium-ion cell manufacturing, positioning it to capitalize on future battery technology opportunities. Understanding the Revenue Streams & Business Model of Exide Industries provides further context to how these ownership dynamics influence its operational strategies.
The ownership structure of Exide Industries is characterized by a strong promoter holding and significant participation from institutional investors.
- Promoter group holds a substantial 45.99% stake as of June 2025.
- Foreign Institutional Investors collectively own 11.47% as of June 2025.
- Mutual Funds manage a 10.30% stake as of June 2025.
- Individual retail investors constitute 25.26% of the ownership as of July 2025.
- The company became publicly traded in June 2002.
Exide Industries PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable

Who Sits on Exide Industries’s Board?
As of July 2025, Exide Industries Limited's Board of Directors is composed of seven active members, representing a blend of executive, non-executive, and independent leadership. This structure is in place to guide the company's governance and strategic trajectory. The board includes key figures such as Sridhar Gorthi, who assumed the role of Chairman and Independent Director on April 30, 2025. R. B. Raheja serves as the Vice-Chairman and Non-Executive, Non-Independent Director. Avik Kumar Roy is the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, with Manoj Kumar Agarwal functioning as Director - Finance and Chief Financial Officer. The board is further strengthened by independent directors Surin Shailesh Kapadia, Radhika Govind Rajan, and Jaidit Singh Brar.
Exide Industries adheres to a one-share-one-vote principle, with no reported equity shares carrying differential voting rights. The promoter group, primarily led by Chloride Eastern Limited, holds a significant 45.99% stake. This substantial ownership translates directly into considerable voting power, influencing critical corporate decisions, including board appointments and major strategic approvals. While there are no recent prominent public records of proxy battles or activist investor campaigns, the board's composition, featuring both independent directors and representatives from major shareholders, indicates a focus on balanced corporate governance. The recent transition in leadership, with Sridhar Gorthi taking over as Chairman, aims to bolster corporate governance and operational efficiency.
Director Name | Position | Director Type |
---|---|---|
Sridhar Gorthi | Chairman and Independent Director | Independent Director |
R. B. Raheja | Vice-Chairman and Non-Executive, Non-Independent Director | Non-Executive, Non-Independent Director |
Avik Kumar Roy | Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer | Executive Director |
Manoj Kumar Agarwal | Director - Finance and Chief Financial Officer | Executive Director |
Surin Shailesh Kapadia | Independent Director | Independent Director |
Radhika Govind Rajan | Independent Director | Independent Director |
Jaidit Singh Brar | Independent Director | Independent Director |
The voting power within Exide Industries is largely concentrated with its promoter group, which holds a majority stake. This structure ensures that the promoters have a significant say in the company's strategic direction and governance. The presence of independent directors on the board is crucial for maintaining oversight and ensuring that decisions are made in the best interest of all stakeholders, aligning with the company's Mission, Vision & Core Values of Exide Industries.
The ownership structure of Exide Industries is primarily defined by its promoter group's substantial shareholding. This concentration of ownership directly impacts voting power and corporate decision-making.
- The promoter group, led by Chloride Eastern Limited, holds 45.99% of the company's shares.
- Exide Industries operates under a one-share-one-vote system, with no differential voting rights shares.
- The board composition includes executive, non-executive, and independent directors to ensure balanced governance.
- Key management roles are held by the Managing Director & CEO and the Director - Finance & CFO.
Exide Industries Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Exide Industries’s Ownership Landscape?
Over the last three to five years, Exide Industries Limited has been actively adapting to the evolving energy storage market. A key strategic initiative has been a significant investment in lithium-ion cell manufacturing. This proactive stance is evident in the company's substantial financial commitments to its subsidiary, Exide Energy Solutions Limited (EESL).
In April 2025, Exide Industries injected an additional ₹300 crore into EESL, bringing the total investment in this venture to ₹3,602.23 crore. This capital infusion is geared towards establishing a 12 GWH green-field cell manufacturing plant in Bengaluru, aiming to capitalize on the burgeoning electric vehicle (EV) market and stationary energy storage needs in India. The company has set an ambitious target to launch a new line of EV batteries by 2024 and aims to secure a 10% share of the Indian lithium-ion battery market by 2025.
Shareholder Type | June 2025 Quarter Holding | June 2024 Quarter Holding |
Promoter Holding | 45.99% | 45.99% |
Foreign Institutional Investors (FII/FPI) | 11.47% | 11.60% |
Mutual Funds | 10.30% | 11.11% |
Regarding ownership trends, the promoter holding has remained consistent at 45.99% as of the June 2025 quarter. While there was a slight decrease in Foreign Institutional Investor (FII/FPI) holdings from 11.60% to 11.47% in the same period, the number of FII/FPI investors remained unchanged. Similarly, Mutual Funds saw a reduction in their holdings from 11.11% to 10.30%. These adjustments are typical within the institutional investment landscape, reflecting dynamic market conditions and evolving investment strategies.
For the financial year ending March 2025, Exide Industries reported a net profit growth of 22.0% year-on-year, reaching ₹10,769 million. This growth was achieved despite a marginal dip in operating income, underscoring the company's operational efficiency and strategic focus.
The company's strategic direction emphasizes expanding domestic manufacturing capabilities for advanced battery technologies. This focus, coupled with a strong cash flow and a zero-debt position, positions Exide Industries to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the battery sector, as detailed in the Growth Strategy of Exide Industries.
Public statements and investor presentations throughout 2024 and 2025 consistently reinforce the company's commitment to a strategic shift towards advanced battery technologies. This forward-looking approach signals a dedication to sustained long-term growth and market leadership.
Exide Industries' robust financial health and strategic investments in new technologies are key drivers for its future market positioning. The company is well-placed to leverage its established presence and invest in innovation to meet the evolving demands of the energy storage industry.
Exide Industries Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked

- What is Brief History of Exide Industries Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of Exide Industries Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Exide Industries Company?
- How Does Exide Industries Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of Exide Industries Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of Exide Industries Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Exide Industries Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.