GET THE FULL COMPANY
ANALYSIS BUNDLE FOR
Waitr
Who owns Waitr now?
The rise and fall of Waitr, rebranded ASAP in 2022, ended with a Chapter 7 filing in April 2024 and a court-appointed trustee controlling the estate. Once backed by founder Chris Meaux and later investors, its assets were auctioned amid $51.4 million liabilities.
Control shifted from public shareholders to a liquidation trustee after assets, including the ASAP brand, were sold to satisfy creditors; by 2025 the company exists only as a liquidated estate.
See Waitr Porter's Five Forces Analysis for related strategic context.
Who Founded Waitr?
Founders and Early Ownership of Waitr centered on a Louisiana-rooted cap table established in 2013 to support rapid regional expansion, with founder control retained while welcoming local angel investors and groups like the New Orleans Startup Fund.
Chris Meaux led as CEO and primary visionary, joined by Addison Killebrew, Manuel Ramirez, and Evgeny Terentev.
Early funding relied heavily on Louisiana-based angels and regional funds rather than Bay Area venture capital.
Initial ownership was concentrated among founders, with Meaux holding the largest individual stake to guide strategy.
Series A and follow-on rounds introduced vesting schedules and buy-sell clauses to protect operational stability during expansion.
Ownership and governance prioritized regional operational expertise to support a hospitality-first delivery model across 200+ cities.
Larger institutional funding needs led to dilution of founder stakes as the company prepared for a public-facing corporate structure and merger activity.
Early ownership evolution set the stage for later transactions and the public entity Waitr Holdings Inc.; for more on the company origins see Brief History of Waitr.
Founders retained meaningful control through structured equity and regional investor support until scaling demands required broader capital sources.
- Founded in 2013 with a Louisiana-centered cap table
- Chris Meaux held the largest founder stake
- Series A rounds in 2015–2016 formalized vesting and buy-sell protections
- Pre-2018 expansion reached over 200 cities before merger into Waitr Holdings Inc.
Complete Waitr Strategy Bundle
- 6 Full Frameworks, 1 Company – All Pre-Researched
- Each Framework Fully Sourced with Real Company Data
- Built for Strategy Courses, Case Studies & MBA Programs
- Adapt to Your Assignment – No Starting from Scratch
- 6 Frameworks: SWOT, PESTLE, Porter's, BMC, BCG and 4P's
How Has Waitr’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
The company’s ownership transformed notably after the November 2018 SPAC merger with Landcadia Holdings, shifting control toward public and institutional investors; later acquisitions, declining share price, and the 2024 Chapter 7 filing further redistributed value toward creditors and trustees.
| Event | Date | Ownership Impact |
|---|---|---|
| SPAC merger with Landcadia Holdings | Nov 2018 | Public listing; Tilman Fertitta emerged as dominant stakeholder; transaction valued at approximately $308,000,000 |
| Acquisition of Bite Squad | 2019 | $321,000,000 deal (cash + stock); dilution of existing equity; new institutional backers |
| Share price collapse and institutional retreat | 2019–2023 | Major holders (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street) reduced positions as price fell from double digits to below $1.00 |
| Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing and liquidation | 2024–2025 | Board control ceded to trustee; equity largely extinguished; secured creditors and vendors prioritized for proceeds |
Key ownership stakeholders evolved from SPAC sponsors and public shareholders to institutional holders during the public phase, then to fragmented retail and distressed funds, and finally to creditors and a bankruptcy trustee following liquidation.
The largest ownership shifts were driven by the 2018 SPAC merger and the 2019 Bite Squad acquisition; by 2025, creditors hold primary claims on remaining assets.
- SPAC merger valued ~$308,000,000 that put Tilman Fertitta in a leading role
- Bite Squad purchase for ~$321,000,000 increased dilution and brought institutional backers
- Institutional holdings (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street) once significant but reduced as share price dropped below $1.00
- Chapter 7 (2024) transferred control to a bankruptcy trustee; creditors top priority for liquidation proceeds
For context on business model and historical revenue drivers that influenced investor sentiment, see Revenue Streams & Business Model of Waitr
From PESTLE Factors to Full Strategy Bundle
- PESTLE + SWOT + Porter's + BCG + BMC + 4P's in One Bundle
- Every Strategic Angle Covered – Nothing Left to Research
- Pre-filled with Company-Specific Research
- No Missing Sections for Your Case Study
- One Download Covers Your Entire Company Analysis
Who Sits on Waitr’s Board?
As of the Chapter 7 filing in April 2024, the board of directors of Waitr Holdings Inc. no longer holds governance authority; control passed to a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee tasked with liquidation and creditor recovery.
| Director | Role / Influence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tilman Fertitta | Major shareholder / Board advisor | Significant influence through affiliated entities; active until insolvency |
| Carl George | CEO and Board Member (pre-bankruptcy) | Led rebrand to ASAP and expansion into grocery/alcohol delivery |
| Landcadia Sponsors | Institutional block influence | Material voting power via concentrated shareholdings |
Until liquidation, Waitr operated on a one-share-one-vote common stock basis (ticker ASAP), but concentrated insider and institutional holdings effectively amplified certain stakeholders' control over strategic pivots and capital decisions.
The formal voting framework gave each common share equal vote, yet concentrated holdings and sponsor influence shaped outcomes prior to insolvency.
- The one-share-one-vote structure meant no dual-class founder protections.
- Tilman Fertitta remained a leading voice and sizable shareholder through affiliated entities.
- Concentrated stakes by insiders and Landcadia sponsors limited retail shareholder impact.
- Post-April 2024 Chapter 7 filing, governance transferred to a bankruptcy trustee under federal law.
Key facts: the company traded under ticker ASAP, faced delisting risk prior to April 2024, and by 2025 no individual or entity retains traditional voting power; asset disposition and creditor recovery fall under trustee supervision. See further context in Target Market of Waitr
Waitr Business Model + Strategy Bundle
- Ideal for Essays, Case Studies & Slides
- Get BCG, SWOT, PESTLE, Porter's, 4P's Mix & BMC Together
- Company-Specific Content Already Organized
- One Bundle Replaces Days of Independent Research
- Buy the Bundle Once. Use Across All Your Assignments
What Recent Changes Have Shaped Waitr’s Ownership Landscape?
Ownership of the company shifted rapidly after the ASAP rebrand and operational halt in April 2024; liquidation and asset auctions in 2025 left the corporate shell effectively defunct while fragments of technology and customer data moved under new buyers.
| Event | Date | Impact on Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Operational cessation and bankruptcy filing | April 2024 | Company halted services; equity holders faced near-total loss against $51,000,000+ liabilities |
| Delisting and OTC trading | Late 2024 | Stock moved to OTC at near-zero values, then canceled in bankruptcy |
| Asset liquidation and IP auction | 2025 | Technology platform and customer databases auctioned to strategic buyers; corporate entity remains a dissolving shell |
The period before collapse saw founder and early investor dilution via secondary offerings and debt-for-equity swaps; rebrand to ASAP in 2022 failed to secure institutional backers and the high logistics burn rate eroded shareholder value.
Liquidation revealed liabilities exceeding $51 million, producing nominal recoveries for common and preferred equity; secured creditors and administrative fees consumed most proceeds.
Multiple secondary raises and debt-for-equity swaps between 2020–2024 reduced founder stakes and deterred long-term strategic investors, accelerating loss of control.
By 2025, consolidation led by DoorDash and Uber Eats left little room for regional mid-tier players; lack of a protective ownership moat made the company vulnerable to pricing pressure.
ASAP technology modules and customer lists were auctioned in 2025, with potential buyers from logistics and fintech sectors acquiring components; corporate legal ownership remains in wind-down.
For additional context on competitors and market positioning that influenced ownership outcomes, see Competitors Landscape of Waitr
From Five Forces to Full Company Analysis
- Includes SWOT, PESTLE, BMC, BCG and 4P's
- Pre-Researched with Company-Specific Data
- Best Value for a Complete Analysis
- Ready to Adapt for Your Case Study
- Ready for Essays and Slidesd
- What is Brief History of Waitr Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of Waitr Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Waitr Company?
- How Does Waitr Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of Waitr Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of Waitr Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Waitr Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.